FAMILY LAW – COSTS – where wife sought an order discharging her liability under a loan with the second respondent bank – where that application was dismissed – where adverse findings were made with respect to the wife’s credit – where all respondents seek an order for costs against the wife – where wife seeks that no order for costs be made or, alternatively, that the costs of the application be reserved to trial – whether any order for costs should be made pursuant to s 117, Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) – where wife’s, husband’s and third and fourth respondents’ costs reserved to trial – where wife ordered to pay the second respondent’s costs of and incidental to the application.
FAMILY LAW – COSTS – where the wife sought an order that the second respondent pay her costs of and incidental to an application for an interlocutory injunction which was granted by this Court on an earlier occasion – where those interlocutory proceedings formed part of the substantive application by the wife seeking to discharge her liability under the loan – where the wife wholly unsuccessful in that substantive proceeding – where the second respondent not ordered to pay the wife’s costs of the interlocutory application.